Frans Tassigny
accept a "short therapy" yes why not, provided that the analysis found a place where the word around, a place where he can make a promise he could not reveal in his analysis, instead of listening to his analysis without the presence of his analyst. YOU UNDERSTAND ANOTHER PLACE, is a play where one is asked to leave his name at the door.
Richard Abibon frans when you write: mean, when I feel dawn in me with a client such as "something Oedipal in what I hear," I say in the same time "you plaques, or do you hear? Are you sure that you get on well, or hear you ... what unanalyzable in you makes you imagine?".
I totally agree with you that's exactly what I keep working.
Frans Tassigny Well, but how synergy with what school without dogma, with what group? Because it is taking huge risks, I know BCP psychoanalysts chilly they often take refuge behind their acquired their "customers" so to speak, which are also among those confused all persuasions and will more than "courage" but "Honesty" to follow you?
It is more prevalent than you might think, she broods, she is made of loneliness and fellowship, she moves, she ignores the mediocrity of a Bourgeois psychoanalysis, she knows the words of adversity should still be with t RIMBAUD the word of a new modern, a new eclipse.
notice of ISABELLE TRAUBE:
Lacan has indeed established a analytical device based on the session short and variable duration.
For him, a session could last only a minute or two ... His students ... have taken this option. It is for them to prevent the patient from indulging in gossip sterile monologue during three quarters of an hour to tell, spill length is analytically useless. Indeed this is not the talking that can heal, so Agreeing last! However, the meeting was over, the shorter the patient is encouraged to go to the essentials show the following
Richard Abibon "Indeed it is not talking for curing is the fact to agree at last! "
Paradox! To agree because we also have time to talk! And we can not agree on 1 or 2 minutes, that's a justification ... cation, but it contradicts everything that I read elsewhere in the work of Lacan and Freud's own : he had already spotted the problem was less to interpretation, being able to find a meaning the symptom as "allow to bring new material. In other words, the fact of agreement can revitalize the floor. And that is what the theorist Lacan developed his concept of meaning, and even signifying chain materialized by the Borromean knot. It is also necessary so that this channel exists, that the elements can find the time to ask, then close. The making of a super session rather short leash chain in perpetual lack of equipment, without being able to one day open to close. .
Furthermore it is not necessary that the opposite of the short session is a monologue by ¾ of an hour. I never considered the sessions as well as a monologue but a dialogue that aims to revive the word "to bring new material" as Freud said
But I recognize that this is a subtle debate, which is to continue.
Frans Tassigny Agreeing is the last! Tell you translate back by one unit, so the reassembly of a mosaic, redial personality .... Could you please clarify
Richard Abibon I'm not sure we need a hearing test unit by: a unit of the self. By speech, slips of the tongue allows it, by the telling of a dream, or tell her symptoms, I realized instead of the various aspect of this ... I can express and they wont name: "this". "It escaped me," and ls FFECT murderous impulses or sometimes expressed dan erotic dream, that it escapes the controls may be in waking life but in sleep it is unleashed ... Well in talking, "it" becomes part of "I", not to say "me" recomposition of course, but in the sense of admitting some diversity, even contradiction within itself. I'm contradictory, I want this and also what is the opposite, but at least "I" said, verifying the saying of Freud: where "it" was I do happen and for that, there must be a some time.
I repeat: where Lacan theorist offers us a great tool, the logical time, the practitioner Lacan currently contracted to do with the time of closing, eradicating any possibility of that time he had theorized, however: the time to understand.
course he also said there is nothing to understand. Well he too had his contradictions! And this is not anything to take the time to locate.
Frans Tassigny Well, you now have to define the end of the analysis ...
Richard Abibon Well! Oh my!
1) Analysis is endless, and once the process begins, it does not stop
2) By cons, one day, we did not want to go to his analyst. We find that there are other more important things to do.
Frans Tassigny yes, it is the image of an hourglass that never ends to drain, because the "salt" of the unconscious is continually renewed, otherwise, some analysands feel that the transfer from the analysis housed in a sort of comfort in the "final" whereas at the end they feel in the "provisional" can be reconciled with the "confusion" of Lacan, of course, but anyway we are still in the "provisional"'re not?
0 comments:
Post a Comment