Jews of all countries ...!
Open Letter to Jews
I take up my pen with some trepidation because I have something serious to say, things that deserve your attention, things that you do not often get to hear . I'll take the time to tell all, slowly and clearly. It is possible, however unwittingly, I pass rapidly over some passages. It will then let me know and I pledge to make any clarifications required.
I address you, Jews of all countries, because it concerns me that the Jews, there is everywhere in Africa, China or Alaska. You acknowledge that all of the same religion or even religious origin as some of you are secular, atheist or agnostic. There is a certain solidarity between you and it concerns me that this solidarity continues and strengthens. I find this solidarity healthy, invigorating and above all human. It's part of our human heritage that weave such solidarities locally or internationally. Moreover, in the era of the Internet weaves these fraternal are greatly facilitated by the Internet universal.
Responsibility
nationalist Jews of all countries, some, much of you have suffered this appalling horror that was the Holocaust. It is always a bit difficult to understand how fever flared up in Europe, but a look naive enough about the events that can diagnose convulsive frenzy; She called nationalist rage.
Alas, since then, nationalism has become so large that the neglect of that time has covered so hard our history. For over 60 years, is accused of the worst evils of Nazism in obliterating the fact that Nazism is, above all, a nationalist. If it is more culpable or more heinous than other nationalisms, the fact remains that they all are, to varying degrees, and for the same reasons.
The Nazis assassinated Jews, Gypsies and Communists. Shared by these three groups of people if not to ignore national borders, primary concern of the nationalists? Jews since time immemorial antiquity, have forged the way for trade and cultural exchanges in Europe. Thanks to them, a bill of exchange issued in Paris could be cashed Baghdad. They were the Internet of the Middle Ages and part of modern times. They had no concern for borders, as the Communists, moreover, who dreamed of internationalism or gypsies who crossed constantly. Let us not forget that they also sent to death fools and homosexuals who, themselves, cared little respect for borders of reason or gender boundaries.
Nationalism is this particular moment in the history of a people by which it decides to reject the heterogeneity that is by removing a significant part of himself. Most often without hesitation to resort to genocide. Once the expulsion or genocide done, once they are assured of sufficient homogeneity within their borders, the Nationalists tend to go into a war of conquest on behalf of a universality that s' invent in the moment and is most often a reflection of this domestic ideal homogeneity they have obtained the sword.
La Reconquista
The clearest example of the phenomenon of nationalism and, indeed, the first of its kind was that of the English Reconquista. The same year that saw completed the reconquest of Spain and the fall of Granada to the Catholic was also the year of the discovery of America when Columbus' caravels were armed by those Catholics.
the same time Jews and Muslims were expelled from Spain. A large Jewish community took root when Constantinople became Istanbul forty years ago. This community will continue to prosper until the fall of the Ottoman Empire after the War of 1914 and continued for several centuries ... to speak English. The collective violence
In violence that was addressed throughout the centuries, we must try to see clear. I am not a connoisseur of the history of violence but I can at least say that such violence can be logically grouped into three categories:
The first is that we can describe as sectarian violence. We can say roughly that when several communities coexist, it is always them a power, which is often a struggle for prestige. This struggle is expressed among others, through pogroms or raids during which individuals are killed but the life of the community is generally abused saved since the purpose of these attacks is most often to humiliate the other to derive prestige. The survival of the other as a group is necessary. His recognition of his defeat is essential to the prestige sought.
The second category could be called nationalist violence. It is for a community to want to physically remove an entire community with which it coexists in the same area. This very special moment in the history of a people is to repress the apparent elements of religious or ethnic identity to promote a quantitative, statistical community in which it is sure not to add apples and oranges. The other community has gone through the weapons because that his very presence makes apparent, not the multiplicity of communities as one might think, but the fact community itself. Once it has eliminated the other community, the remaining community can live with the belief that the fact no longer exists. All the signs that surround it, even the religious among them, are familiar to him and lose, because even their character marking community. And if by chance the evolution of historical consciousness, signs, previously innocuous, resume their religious character, there is nothing to get rid of those signs specifically there to regain consciousness without stain. One could compare this to the fact that we have great difficulty tolerating the smell intimate neighbor, then we feel our only "clean" smells. For nationalism is essentially a question of image. This is for the genocidal community, to give an image of itself which are absent the trappings of religion or ethnicity. The project once completed, nationalism needs to further homogenization of the world ..
That leaves the third scenario where violence is at stake: the universalist violence. This is the case he must stop a dispersion or a geographic fragmentation by providing a self-image completely unitary. Nationalism then adopt the same logical options in the previous case. To clear his conscience of its own fragmentation he must eliminate the outside world. So it must clear both the diversity of others, that unlike the other as other. The solution is therefore very simple but compelling: It is the conquest of the other. It unifies the diversity and cancel the other as other.
These are the three kinds of abuse you have endured successively or together as a Jewish community on the planet but especially in Europe. I leave you to decide which of the three categories within each of the abuses you have suffered. It is obvious that the Holocaust was a particularly traumatic for both you and the rest of humanity who saw a kind of exceeding human limitations: A desire to destroy an entire population doubled capacity effectively implement the project. Something that resembles the bottom to the Hiroshima atomic bomb but with the clear intention to use until the end. The Holocaust represents the total destruction when a population becomes technically possible. But it's also the horror a set of people who support a long and hatefully their desire to act against their neighbors that possibility yesterday.
To have seen death so close, seeing the hatred in the eyes of an entire people is an unspeakable experience that leaves deep scars, sometimes indelible. It is extremely important that trauma can be treated in multiple ways. The way he was treated is not necessarily the only, let alone the best far from it. Trauma Nazi inaugurated the ability to move effectively and exterminate whole populations. It is true that the Armenian genocide had already preceded the trend, but it was a traditional character that does not begin to the industrial character of the camps Nazi bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki or famine in Ukraine. This is not a feature of Nazism but a feature of nationalism to try and sort in ethnicities and religions. The large confinement
This movement is similar to another scale treatment will suffer the fools from the 18th century and describes Foucault in the History of Madness in the Classical Era. Very suddenly at some point, an atypical group of individuals whose crazy, were excluded from public life and locked up. The reasons they gave for this confinement fell within social hygiene and not of concern with respect to these pariahs. Only long after we have locked one has bothered to sort between the common law convicts, vagrants and lunatics. And then and only then that fools began to receive specific clinical treatment other than being confined only.
The concept of the Zionist state of Israel is part of this same logic Promethean displacement of populations. Select and Jews around the world, remove them from their natural environment to send to Israel is comparable to a logic, a logic which agrees with the idea that their presence in their country of origin is now abnormal. There is a bias segregationist who follows all segregations produced by nationalism in the course of its expansion.
A fact to note, however, is that unlike the segregation that confined the insane expulsion of Jews is far from being the product of the communities from which they come. Instead, it is the result nationalist spirit encouraged pat the old national powers and the Zionist movement itself. In other words, dams most cases the Jews were expelled from their own communities where they lived for several millennia, no other reason than the attraction of a nationalist ideology that made them sparkle an alleged control of their destiny. They dropped the prey of their roots to the shadow of power and control.
Nothing compelled them to do so. They could very well have stayed. But the horror of the Holocaust was probably caused panic in their ranks. This is probably this moment in the emergence of panic that everything was decided. Why the Jews left their homeland it respective to jump into the adventure of control and power? This is really the question, if we are to understand the sequence of events.
It might not be
Before trying to understand the causes of the phenomenon it is important to say something, that nowadays it is hard to understand: that the Jews might well have stayed where they were always and that nothing threatens their survival. They could have, in their respective countries, collect the trauma of the Holocaust and do something different from one country to another.
A solidarity could well arise between the Jews of all countries around the trauma. It is likely that while the nationalist character of the Holocaust would have been much more evident. That the Jews by nature, if I may say, are stubborn nationalism is no longer clear to everyone. They would then be able to support and enable non-nationalist trends of significant areas of our planet who have never had this penchant including Muslim areas.
Jews could continue their centuries-old struggle against the state of Roman type, then the nationalist state. Struggle was not only intended to maintain their existence against the destructive nationalism of the state, but rather had the advantage of always highlight the essential dimension of community in front of a state who is blind.
And finally, continue their momentum remarkable intellectual whose principal architects were Jewish intellectuals supporting a viewpoint always original and rewarding. The Jews could have continued to question a Western science that swoons in the certainty of self. Find a historical situation that can produce Marx, Freud and Einstein, will no longer within our grasp soon. All these perspectives
unfortunately have collapsed because of fear. Jews for reasons that should be clarified all gathered in Palestine after the war to create what they thought was their last refuge, "the state of Israel." Fear can certainly encourage people to come together and, for those who do not feel fear, it's probably the attraction of Israel, Promised Land, which could encourage them to leave their homeland. The herd instinct
We call this gregarious tendency of humans and animals come together in times of fear. Sheep for instance, tend to join the herd when they feel fear. The shepherds have used that instinct to their advantage. When an animal gets lost, simply send a barking dog and voila, he returned to take refuge in the herd.
For humans, things seem to happen in a comparable way. One might think that because nationalism in particular carries a lot of fear to carry out ethnic cleansing. The neighbors of yesterday become today's enemies because fear serinée propaganda causes them to suddenly turn to their community and now see their neighbor as an enemy. We encounter similar situations when a state is incapable of maintaining public order. The prevailing concern when people are also encouraged to take refuge in their respective communities.
Fear protective
That said, things are unfortunately not so simple. In humans, fear is not an episodic and transient. Once she has the opportunity, the fear lingers, it changes the landscape and psyche turns in his favor. An effect of the most important, fear, fear of the first one that causes the trauma, it is discredits those who so far provided protection to the person. This item is also to protect an essential element of the psychic structure, that is, the psyche spontaneously tends to replace the discredited protector ... by fear itself.
And he starts to believe in fear as others would believe in God, that is having doubts about the existence of this fear or the existence of a sudden and incredible sense of security. This belief is so much part of his mental landscape that he will convene as often as his distress claims it. The " belief "in fear is the" console "of disarray in which plunges her trauma. Fear, his pomps and his works, his doubts and anxieties will be the cover of his distress.
Whenever there is a parade or protection against his fear, he will feel helpless before the memory of his trauma. It will then create new reasons to be afraid to avoid falling into the horror of the trauma. Israel
instrument trauma
To return to the Jews, or rather the fear that their abhorrence of the Holocaust has inspired them most certainly precipitates to an accumulation point who happened to be the brand new State of Israel. This, however, that the cycle of trauma has secured its grip on them.
Israel became a refuge for them, but also the surest way to live together the effects of trauma, the safest way to ensure that each time the horror of the Holocaust will reach them, they will have the way to make credible fear. The first act which was reflected by the effect of the trauma was to create a Jewish state and nationalism in a predominantly Muslim environment and who had never known nationalism. This state form was not mandatory. Other forms have been more suited to middle-middle East. Would that form multi-community with a predominance of a community that had been created in Lebanon.
The form chosen was one that guaranteed as a permanent state of war for several decades. Zionist leaders were well aware. They knew that a war would require several decades to be accepted by the Arabs. It is true that the Zionist movement was a nationalist and could not imagine doing things differently.
amalgam
The trauma was thus able to "feed" a state of hostility with the environment almost permanently. Zionist leaders were convinced that the Jews had been normal for Arabs to accept in their regions and their lands and their recalcitrant reaction was proof of their hostility and their anti-Semitism. They were able to cultivate the confusion between European anti-Semitism of the Holocaust and the reaction quite normal and expected the Arabs.
It was clear here, and this is crucial, the Zionist leadership was not interested in being "accepted" by the Arabs, let alone win to them, they sought, consciously or not, to keep this permanently the original traumatic situation. They fanned by every means possible hostility of the Arabs, knowing full well that without arrogance systematic Arabs had accepted without any difficulty as they had accepted massive Armenians victims of genocide in 1918.
Trauma staged
Reliving the trauma frequently and regularly is often a good way to understand and possibly exceed it. It is also necessary that the right circumstances, recognition that the trauma in his nightmares eg an unconscious desire on his part to relive the trauma in the violence that still inspires him the trauma he can make the part that belongs to this and deserves to be preserved as such and what belongs to the past and deserves instead of being transformed, sublimated in a way.
Alas, the reliving of the trauma has lived in Israel in reality. The Arabs were undoubtedly anti-Semitic Nazis and they therefore deserve all the violence and hatred possible. At no time has occurred to anyone that this war has straddled endemic for decades could be staged for reworking and transcend the trauma.
Theatre is taken for reality
Usually, however, it will be seen easily. The behaviors of traumatized are often so excessive that they deceive themselves about their psychological nature. The trauma itself, ends quickly conceded that his hatred of others is symptomatic. If the United States right now, for example, is sufficiently oversized so that the world realizes it is a trauma. Much of the Americans themselves have realized this and campaigning for the abandonment of fear as the main engine of their subjectivity.
In Israel, however, none of this. No Israelis, no Jew of the diaspora, no West, no Arab has entered the theatrical aspect of the case. The total impasse on that issue. Everyone agrees and must agree that trauma is insurmountable and that even if the dispute lasts almost 60 years later, because the Palestinians and the Arabs are ... Can be replaced by the ellipsis we want is their fault anyway, not the effects of trauma.
Here we could send me back my own arguments by using them against me. In saying that though I relive that trauma is the usual way to achieve the reverse, how explain the fact that 60 years later, the effects of trauma have so far not feel like he was still very recent.
Or the issue of trauma has nothing to do with the behavior of the Israelis who are defending themselves, or the trauma was so terrible that even 60 years have been sufficient to absorb any way. I agree that supporting the arrogant behavior of Israel is an effect of trauma and is, somehow, therapy to trauma may seem outrageous when so many years later therapy seems to have no effect. But I would argue however that a further difficulty was grafted on an already difficult problem and made it almost insoluble. This is your relation to the West (and hence to the East) that you trapped in a hopeless situation.
trap compensation
It is generally agreed that Israel was given to you by the victors of World War II as compensation for the Holocaust. This story is totally false for several reasons. First, because the only ones who can give you a good are those who possess it. After the war the victors, who were none other than the statements of the colonial past and neocolonial of the future, offering you a part of the land of Palestine, did nothing but steal the Palestinians the opportunity to welcome you their land. In doing so, they not only gave you a property that does not belong to them, thus turning you into fences, but you have deprived forever be able to enjoy peace of this land.
The idea that Palestinians can offer hospitality to their land may seem today, totally implausible. Yet, admittedly, is what they have already done since the nineteenth century, never complaining. Only when they were forced to do, when you, the Jews have become a card in the politics of colonial and neo-colonial they began to resist in 1936.
Aboriginal place of Aboriginal
Your Zionist leaders thought that by partnering with the colonizer, the law of the jungle, they'd have more chance to succeed. They have done a very poor calculation. What we gave them was conquered by force and you should keep indefinitely by strength. It is true that their miscalculation was already registered in advance in their national culture. They did not seek a refuge for Jews, they sought to end the nomadic nature of the Jews, they wanted to press them on land and only once. They wanted to turn them into native place of Aboriginal thus ending a tradition rich and tumultuous three millennia. Ask
hospitality of the Palestinians had been recognized that there was indigenous and all the nationalist dream of a land without people for a people without land collapsed. He had to deny not only that the opinion of the Palestinians but it was important to deny their existence. It is an idea so absurd and stupid that you have spent decades of strife. Without this utopia you would now useless healthy communities throughout the Arab world and the whole earth was your refuge. Instead you live behind a wall, being constantly terrorized.
By "giving" the land of Palestine the winners of 45 and your Zionist leaders, you are trapped in a trap or you're hated by the world with a few exceptions. Those responsible for this disaster, they are Western or Israeli, continue to pretend that this hatred is due to anti-Semitism. It's their only line of defense to hide the disaster they caused almost global.
The West gave you nothing but trouble and misfortunes. It is time that you recognize. Not as we recognize a truth passing in the path of thinking, but because it is an idea that plays a vital and insistent at your misfortune.
The pact of silence
you believe that the West has compensated for your misfortune is not only a untrue, but again, this belief robs you of your unhappiness. It's just as if you had bought your silence, as if it had acquired the right to prevent you from questioning the Holocaust. The West is full of ways for you until the bitter end, because he is afraid he is afraid that someday Jews will wake up to try to understand what happened to them.
So far we have agreed to an easy solution: to say that Hitler was the embodiment of the monstrosity. But is it possible one day to say more? Will it be said that the word "national" of National Socialist Party can be found on the pediment of all western parliaments? And how to explain this astonishing haste to send you into that trap that is Palestine? Was it really so urgent as that? Are we really sure that this is of concern? Logically it is certainly more risk in one place than scattered around the world. All these issues seem to float in the air with no one to take. They would have a different weight if you had asked in having remained in Europe.
What you did not know though, is that giving up those questions is a daily act. That these issues will continue to rise indefinitely and that it will, whenever they arise, find a new reason to suppress them by demanding further compensation forever unsatisfied. The land you've been granted is too narrow, it takes even longer, or we will take it and you should discourage potential predators. In short, the fight to save or conquer the land becomes Crown questioning indefinitely suspended.
These questions you ask about Europe are systematically erased by the idea that you were "compensated" by the donation of land, you were paid to do the more you ask these questions. The only thing that you would still ask these questions is that the compensation is inadequate or there is any flaw in this fake contract that binds you to them.
The Holocaust, impossible to question, always relived in the present, remains unsurpassable. Instead of gradually burden is lightened instead that over time it becomes an event commemorated, it is also keen that after Auschwitz, and even more weight to what decades of incessant struggles added weariness and despair. And, let's be clear, this is not the horror of genocide makes it impassable, is the fact that you were trapped inside by claiming the "reward".
You're caught in a vicious circle;
1. ask those questions that ask Western nationalism.
2. Not being able to ask them because you believe you have been paid to keep quiet.
3. You disagree with certain parts of the pact of silence to be able to speak again.
4. It pays you back handsomely for you to silence.
short, the Holocaust can never be reworked requestionné its causes. He became a foil to the best of horror at worst an instrument of blackmail.
Here is where the vicious cycle of hellish proportions properly, is when he addresses the Arabs or Palestinians. The first three steps are then identical, except that the Arabs do not feeling affected by the Holocaust, to take all these nuances of gestures that have no other purpose than to provoke a fight for prestige to which they well feel obliged to take part. They retaliated as best they could with the limited success that we know the extent where they feel somewhat concerned at what they take to the arrogance of a conqueror bridgehead of the West in any case stronger than them.
As for Jews, cons, and No. 4 as the behavior does not occur, as the enemy does not compensate spontaneously for challenging the contract they have begun, never mind, they compensate spontaneously, and take their "due" on the land of others. The strangest thing however is that at the top of the third phase, when the Jews have converted the opportunity to talk by challenging the contract of silence, even when they end up falling in silent phase 4. Even if the Arabs are not ready to understand what the West understands and will not renew with them a new agreement of silence, even when they are silent by paying a new tranche of Arab land. Several factors play
cons that voice. First, the weakness of the Arabs who resist so little that the sale of their land is almost a gift. Then, the successive victories make the process easy and repetitive, almost irresistible. Finally, on top of layer 3, it must be someone to say what he really is, he tells them the opportunity to speak at this particular time. Between in-crawling Western incomprehension and fearful of Arabs there are few who dare venture onto terrain too slippery. As nothing is to use this moment of grace in Phase 3, Phase 4 may then proceed as planned.
Perhaps the advantage of this open letter itself, pointing at each round of vicious circle, if someone is there to take note, you would be able to exempt you from a little to take a little freedom in your addiction to the West. That may be the interest of this analysis into four steps that show the locations or freedoms can be Pises.
Places of freedom
From Phase 1, for example, the Holocaust could not be caught in the misery of the reward. Out of this straitjacket, the Holocaust might be a good way to reward those who question and why they reward.
Out of misery, in a context where, at last, the dignity of Jews would be respected, we could at least take the trouble to see that the Jews had something to defend and they are not dead just because of the arbitrary madness of the Nazis. This is not because they are mad or bad as the Nazis attacked the Jews. Anti-Semites are not degenerate as neuropathic this neo-Nazis today. The Jews are the repository of a certain knowledge which I in no way agrees with Nazism or indeed with any nationalism. For this reason, and for this reason that only seeks to make them disappear.
strange reversal
In the same spirit of freedom of Letter Carriers impertinent questions one might ask how the Jews who are opposed for over 2000 years the Roman State and its successor, the nationalist state, could be fully returned by the Zionist nationalism within a few years.
That entire community suddenly abandons multi-millennia tradition on which it based its existence is surprising in itself, but that this same community adopts positions diametrically opposed to its traditions in the space of a few years is almost miracle.
This phenomenon is probably due to trauma. The Jews have managed to maintain their distance from statements that included nationalists. They have managed to maintain their distance from their community institutions. Faced with these pressures to uniformity, they have maintained a certain threshold. Probably thanks to a god whose phallic nature is very apparent. This God protects, but it can also punish severely by Philistines interposed. He allowed that they lose some battles, even some wars. He did, however, never came to abandon his people at the hands of an enemy determined to destroy it. If he did it maybe because he has waived the uncertainty of his existence to decide on the side of the non-existence.
abandoned him, the Jews could not resist or the community spirit that pushed them to regroup after the Holocaust, nor to nationalist pressure was finally able to eat them after sharp incisors so many thousands of years. This turnaround is not really one. It is rather the fulfillment of something indefinitely given a kind of acting out due to the decisive non-existence of Yahweh.
Trapped in the community
The community identity of Jews was held in awe by them for millennia. That's what allowed them to conquer ever new territories. They had this freedom of movement in relation to the community spirit that opened up their world.
With the Holocaust and the determination of the Lord's side of the non-existence, community spirit has become imperative and acted as an impetus to the gathering. All the territories that the Jews had laboriously conquered for so many centuries have been abandoned almost overnight as if a tidal wave or a neutron bomb before everything away in its path.
Some Jews are still resisting the appeal of the gathering: Jews in the Diaspora. They maintain their presence throughout the world except in countries where the voltage was the hardest. But this presence is almost heroic in the price of a significant change of identity. They became national power of the state of Israel. They must justify the actions of Israel, or disconnect it, pay their contribution to the state of Israel or refuse to pay.
Being Jewish for them amounts to be a pseudo-Israeli or a pseudo-non-citizen. They have however retained the ability to meet non-Jews without it threatens their loyalty to Judaism.
The reversal of the Jews in favor of nationalism after several millennia of fierce resistance also deserves a thorough explanation. The Zionist movement attributed to merely shift the problem up a notch. Because you have to explain the sympathy of the Jews for this movement for 50 years while they were regarded with indifference. You could also say that it is the terror of the Holocaust that has thrown them into the arms of Zionism. But there is a stage of reasoning is skipped. Between the terror of the Holocaust and the nationalist frenzy, there are certainly steps in between.
Abraham
bride of Yahweh
I referred to earlier this particular relationship with Yahweh of the Jews. I think this is one of the most important points on which we earn to linger. Many thousands of years have found this inadequate report, privileged in some way, which made the Jews the "chosen people" of a god, only to boot. Unique choice of a single god, they are evacuating the rest of humanity in darkness. The latter interpretation is extremely superficial and does not withstand analysis, but it must be mentioned because it is very common and happens to be one of the foundations most often discussed anti-Semitism.
The ratio of Jews with Yahweh is recalled, a covenant relationship. Alliance was sealed between the patriarch Abraham and Yahweh at the well of Beer Sheba. There is a contractual relationship entered into between Abram and Yahweh. In exchange for his loyalty, Abraham (now) receive the promise of having as many offspring as the stars of heaven and the sand of the sea When the contract is also sealed around a well, who represents the genitals female, it becomes quite clear that he regards a report of a sexual nature. It is true that despite all indications are that data were difficult to recognize behind the beard of the venerable patriarch .... a bride. The election here is the choice of a wife. Wife Abraham who represents the community. His fidelity to the husband God will give it a reproduction without limits of time and number.
Bris alliance
The alliance is a marriage that is reproduction and thus survival of the community. The contract has been completed by Yahweh and therefore warranted to be maintained. Terms with the Holocaust the contract have changed. We can say that somehow the Lord no longer complied with the terms. Not only has he continued to ensure the reproduction of the Jews, but he also failed to protect them during the Holocaust. There is clearly a breach of contract.
This contract has protected the Jews against all sorts of pressures that could crush them. Without it Judaism would probably never existed. The breaking of this contract is therefore disastrous consequences, insofar as it leaves the Jews without a contract. In itself, nationalism in which the Jews immediately fell is not a new contract. It is a contract between a "nation" and a state that seems to replace the contract with the Lord. But they have nothing in common with each other.
Israel can replace Yahweh?
Yahweh is an abstract entity which needs the community of Jews to exist. While the state of Israel is a relatively concrete entity which, in principle, could dispense with the support of Jews to exist. A "normal" is not threatened in its existence if its population or the rest of the world continues to be passionate about it.
For the State of Israel may look like in terms abstraction to the Lord, he must have, like him, the same status uncertain and dependent on a certain collective will. It is therefore necessary that the existence of the state of Israel is continuously threatened so he can apply to generate the same level of mobilization as Yahweh. Should, however, that the threat is no longer valid, so that no danger foreseeable risk that it take shape, the state of Israel is automatically changed status. Instead of being an equivalent of the Lord in times of danger, it becomes an institution that inspires or fatigue, or guilt.
Guilt secular and fatigue disorder
Guilt is certainly the most economical way to address the institutional weight of the state. The fact of owning something without rival is counterbalanced by a sense of guilt. We find this sense of guilt particularly among Jews who left, feeling guilty of possessing something illegal, are willing to sacrifice one to have a clear conscience. They have an advantage over the other: that of having a secular ideal that has not been too shaken by the Holocaust or loss of Jehovah. Guilt is part of the secular ideal of equal sharing.
In contrast, those who experience fatigue "a secure Israel living in a situation far more dramatic to the extent that it is their vital energy is greatly attenuated. Fatigue is the seat of their difficulty, they are trapped inside. It can only grow if they do not take swift action to stop it.
The first measure is the most natural dissatisfaction. If this report in full with a pacified state is preserved a degree of dissatisfaction there is less the risk of being overwhelmed by the institutional gravity. A state which needs the support that our desire is a serious problem not only if he no longer needs us, but moreover we meet claims.
is not of course a dissatisfaction which covers services offered by the state, but the fundamental dissatisfaction that bears on how the existence of this state. Faced with a hypothetical donor (the West), it is as lacking a little extra respect or land. We demand that little bit more with even greater vehemence that the claim was in itself beneficial effects.
Claim is however easily confused. Long ago that the West is the highest bidder in this kind of negotiation. He washed his hands with the blood of those fair since it has been replaced by Arabs. In fact the dissatisfaction that can not be expressed towards the West, is manifested by all kinds of provocations against Arabs. Humiliation, imprisonment, murder, grabbing of land and water: everything is good to revive the war and the danger that puts an end to weariness engendered peace. Those
are familiar with psychoanalysis have recognized in the first neurotics obsessive guilt that feed and live in a world relatively consistent even if the father died there. In this case, that of secularism or the Lord died not because of the Holocaust, but because of a general movement of secular modernization.
The infernal cycle of hysterical
In the latter one can also recognize the frustration that leads to hysterical quickly, lack of contacts on the provocation of trauma. The right-wing Israelis and Sharon are particularly models of this kind of behavior. For them the process is relatively complex. It begins with the disappearance of Yahweh, father figure, because of the Holocaust which makes them extremely vulnerable to all forms of institutional inclusive, of the maternal type.
When, in peacetime, these forms become prevalent nursery they look a little leeway as it is. So they try to challenge the "gift" of Israel that the West gave them to emerge as a place to speak in this confinement feeding. Not a chance, the position of the West angelica leaves no margin dialogue. It gives them satisfaction quickly, leaving no outlet for grievances.
The challenge must act in the lead instead of deploying in a statement. The provocations against the Palestinians and Arabs are to replace negotiation with the West. Thus step by step process that begins with the Holocaust and the death of Lord leads by necessity as a war on endemic.
The failure lay
As long as the secular project was still believable, this aspect was much less obvious. But since the Oslo accords and their inability to provide effective solutions for both Palestinians and psychological Jews is gradually "project" traumatic took precedence over the secular project.
Today lay people are on a drip in the Middle East. They only have the prestige of the past. For the rest, they die of old age or undergo retraining as a final target of the hated "traumatic". They go off in a final fireworks. Sadat, Rabin, Saddam Hussein, Arafat suffered the final indignity to have supported a secular nationalism that history would not hold beyond the borders of Europe.
The rise of religious nationalism
religious nationalism, by contrast, seems to have a huge potential for expansion. I will not go into geostrategic considerations, but it is certain that the religious nationalism that is able to form large religious complexes, is particularly encouraged by the current trend of globalization.
we see now taking shape, which was unimaginable a few years ago, an Islamist bloc. This block is apparently in conflict with Jewish and Christian fundamentalism, when in reality the three fundamentalism feed on each other. Proof is that Islamic fundamentalism has never been so powerful that since he "enjoys" the American hostility. In the same way that Jewish fundamentalism has never been so sure of his argument that since the Hamas and Jihad have prospered.
Present circumstances greatly promote fundamentalism because they militate in favor of the formation of religious blocs. In addition, currently, the three fundamentalisms have accumulated extremely high potential for harm in terms of weapons or in terms of potential hate.
against them however, it becomes increasingly clear that they have achieved all three levels of bestiality that repels up their own activists. You can not get away with such levels of deprivation. Which is fabulous in humans is only the lowest levels of abjection he always finds a way to raise his head to reconstruct a world of hope. Fundamentalism has reached such a level of power as the only force able to counter or to moderate his anger is the bare hand of man. In those moments when the horizons are particularly bleak, the time has perhaps come to say no to bestiality. The time may be ripe to make to humanity's rights.
On return to the human
This burst of humanity, however, must be conducted with greater vigilance for opportunities to achieve his goal. Care must be taken that it should not be before it will develop.
1. It will not be a burst of indignation. For the indignation is a political weapon which unfortunately does not always lead to more insight.
2. It will not start a religion because you can not ask people who have lost the sense of divine find it in a burst. Fundamentalism is a reaction to the disappearance of the sense of the divine and not excessive belief in God as he would have us believe. It's a reaction that wants to do "as if God was not dead." The exaggeration in the application of the law is a way to hide the disappearance of one who is supposed to defend the application. It's basically a disclaimer that says "No he did not die because the law is still applied.
3. It will not lay a start. Secularism has exhausted its resources in the Middle East. It remains few secular states in the Middle East who owe their survival than usual. The secular parties are gradually losing their electorate and has little effect in stimulating some good feelings. It is clear that secularism is far from being transcended religious boundaries, let alone national borders. Especially since some have claimed to be secular and Jewish without seeing any contradiction.
4. It will not last a burst of political compromise or fatigue are likely not end a conflict in general dissatisfaction. These solutions are generally transitory and only a few diehards satisfied for blowing the political structure like a house of cards.
The burst will be neither moral nor religious nor secular, nor political. It is rather a burst or knowledge will play a major role. Knowledge that will cover both the moral, religious, the secular and the political. Brief knowledge that will exercise his talents on the knowledge. Knowledge that will focus on how a community deals with its reality, its worldview on the whole. Knowledge that may include sudden changes in most of world views as those who have reached the Jews after the Holocaust.
Designs Unique and universal
Whenever we wanted to build a state of a nationalistic, it was necessary to rely on a conception of the world particularly suitable for a particular religion. He must however face a number of changes for it to take firm root in command of the state. These changes aimed to make him lose his religious appearance, keeping only its logical structure.
We have seen how European nationalism for the mutation occurs in two stages. The first is to eliminate other worldviews ie other religions or at least ask them to erase all their apparent religious symbols. Whereby the European nationalist can retain its religious symbols. They become transparent because they are no longer compared to other religious symbols. The nationalist can forget his religion and still practice it.
The second step is to eliminate other worldviews outside the country in their geographical environment to position itself as universal. What is unbearable this time it's geographical diversity. If in the first nationalist wants to forget his religion, in the second time he wants to forget the concreteness of his being of flesh, its ethnic and racial and geographic boundaries. It certainly continues to be a flesh marked racially and ethnically but managed to forget by moving to an abstract universalism. The elimination of alternative conceptions of the world outside her borders can be only be one of many approaches that can not be more than a figure of purity. He conquered everything that can be conquered in its geographical environment to cover a veil these differences irrelevant.
Geographies universalities
It yal'universalité whose geographical area was continental. One thinks of Napoleon or Hitler. There was also the universality of oceanic exerted by countries that had no registration geographic mainland. One can think of Spain, Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, England and Japan. Recent universalities were described as colonial because they would look far negation of the other, unable to do so in their immediate environment.
These universalities oceanic and colonial, it is one that stands out enough clearly in his technique of negating the other. Instead of dominating the other directly as did the other universal, practice setting it to equal international community. It is the universality Anglo-Saxon took off the British Empire Avenue and, with the decline of the latter, the American Empire.
Equalize and conquer
Universality Anglo-Saxon as it dominates a population, means within this population of different religions or different ethnic groups. She then formulates the idea, which was never occurred to anyone in this population, that different religions or ethnic groups should be equal. The very idea of equal inter-community totally disrupts the community balance and causes endemic wars that can last for decades.
Indeed, before the intervention of universal Anglo-Saxon, the different ethnic groups lived within themselves and not thinking that rarely differentiate the ethnic neighbor, let alone to measure them . The notion of equality the fate of their inner strength and to measure to one another incessantly. At each moment of their lives, suspicion settled in their minds that equality has been broken for the benefit of your neighbor and he must take action against the usurper who are deprived of their right to equality.
So that each of these communities that once lived inside of herself in a mystical relationship with his god or his ancestors is suddenly deprived of itself and forced to migrate to the image that it projects to the outside world. Each community is no longer the image of herself and ends up living his skin instead of inhabiting his body. The invisible hand
Meanwhile, universal Anglo-Saxon, who holds the reins of the process, draws all possible benefits from its dominant position while enjoying a status of invisibility and stealth that puts free of vicissitudes. It did not even need to exert its dominance directly most of the time. He just needs to rekindle or extinguish fires between communities so quick to ignite.
It follows that the Anglo-Saxon community ends up being the only community have no boundaries to the extent that it does not need to compete against another community. It can therefore live within itself without worrying about its image. And as, moreover, it can handle further and it pleases a lot of events in the world without appearing to touch it directly, it serves as a model for other communities almost disembodied it dominates it acquires a single abstract character similar to the queen.
Different universalities continental or oceanic all suffered significant declines, especially universal secular French continues to lose feathers regularly in favor of universal American. Only the latter associated with the universality UK continues to experience phenomenal growth.
The dual authority and its decline
The best example is the fury of the Anglo-Saxons on Iraq. The main criticism one could make Saddam Hussein had ties with France and its determination to stay the course of secularism. With the decline more pronounced secularism, the Anglo-Saxons felt entitled to destroy Saddam the prospect of playing the game of making religious equality and create a conflict endemic they can manipulate at will and eventually extend to the entire region. The opposition of France was mainly due to the fact that she lost a staunch ally speaking the same state as it: secularism.
In the early twentieth century, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East was in a situation of great homogeneity predominantly Sunni. The only potential conflict that it was possible to stir from Lebanon so that they gave a rather limited scope.
already immigrated Jews in Palestine since the nineteenth century as an individual. The English saw a potential conflict to foment. The Balfour Declaration came to an extent a purely political community. Jews were also promoted equal Arabs and the seeds of endless conflict and was planted.
Curiously, however, England was not alone in the ranks. France, she also chose to print its universality in competition with the English. Indeed the political system of the state of Israel since 1948 to agreements Oslo or until Rabin's assassination was that of a secular state in the French. Widely encouraged by France, which also offered him a bonus the atomic bomb. Ditto on the Palestinian side, the Palestinian resistance movement and the Palestinian Authority to which it gave birth were extremely consistent secular organizations. The dual authority
French and Anglo-Saxon is now gone. Anglo-American domination prevails widely and manages to print in the Middle East conflict that ethno-religious character with increasing success. All groups Religious Middle East are thus trapped in an endemic conflict with a neighboring group around the issue of equality. They have the impression of defending the authenticity of their being when in reality they live outside of themselves in an imaginary space circumscribed by the look of this neighbor they are jealous. In this struggle against the neighbor-rival, they are merely puppets of the neo-colonial system that thrives quietly in the wings.
Triage nationalist
Each of these communities no longer feels able to regain its original interior and, for the most part, are totally forgotten that it was something that was possible, however, already existed in the past. Polarization by equality with neighboring rival defer any attention to the external border and obliterates all memory of the past situation where all the tension was internal.
nationalism led to believe in a long process of undermining it impossible to coexist several religions, different ethnic groups both in the same state. He succeeded to some extent to make a global sorting of ethnicities and religions so that every religion and every ethnic group have their own space independent political rival and another.
That several ethnicities and religions can coexist and share the same space of political expression has become completely unbelievable. Yet sixty years ago or a hundred years, much of the world was governed in this way. It took two world wars, several genocides and ethnic cleansing caused by Zionism to this fact becomes impossible.
were the great empires that provided the management of ethnic and religious mosaic. The Russian Empire, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman were nurseries diverse communities in which they framed the way of prosperity fairly balanced. The various Jewish communities have also experienced great prosperity under the empire.
Know the multi-community
It is difficult today to wish the return of empires, even if they have advantages. They were so discredited build nationalism. It is possible however to create the collective knowledge that can serve as a framework for the many ethnic and religious diversity. Knowledge that allows each community to have an inner life while preserving the possibility of multiple community.
comparative knowledge was built at the individual psyche. It permits within the same entity psychic expression of a multiplicity of different sex drives by promoting the fact they have no way to interfere with each other. This knowledge is, of course, psychoanalysis that, incidentally, a Jew was coined in the informed consent of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. There is a similar knowledge to create on the collective level that would allow various forms of religious and ethnic management of sexuality and reproduction, to coexist in the same political else thrown out without being their interiority.
Everyone is colonized
Pending the emergence of such knowledge he must yield to the evidence that nationalism is being devastated by the Middle East as it devastated Europe. We have to face the fact that colonial domination is far from ended. After being dominated jointly by France and England, the Middle East is now the exclusive purpose of exclusively Anglo-Saxon colonialism.
Those who think the Middle East to be agents of their destiny, are nothing more than puppets in a theater where they do not control anything. There are like bulls getting darker indiscriminately on red rags to the alleged inter-communal equality. Israel, however powerful it is, is a colonized country, just as every country in the Middle East. They are pawns of the game we now call colonial globalization. Pawns being moved by waving the red rag of jealousy and inequality.
The prospects for improving the situation are simply nonexistent. In the short to medium term, things only get worse. Stand firm against his skin only adds to the enemy colonial dependence while giving the impression that an actor of his destiny. This game simply has no end.
0 comments:
Post a Comment